15 Jan 2017神無月
Jupiter-9 85mm portrait. Film feeling made easy to handle and natural halation.*
A field angle suitable for portrait, brightness and blur usable from F2.0, the shortest distance of shooting is 115 m, which is a little long, but a unique odd feeling coupled with halation and blurring which is whitish blue occurs, It is a wonderful lens to compare the sense of distance with.
Lens and manufacturer introduction
Jupiter-9 85mm/F2.0 M42 1975
Jupiter-9 that Carl Zeiss’ s Sonnar is based.
It is highly recommended to portrait!
This time we will post that portrait on the axis.
· I will write about the portrait pretty with the old lens I’m used to a lot.
· Try how much you can make use of Jupiter 9’s good points and taste to depict human skin.
Jupiter-9 ‘s soft blurring and narrow lines are ideal for soft portraits.
Not only is it not only soft but it says that it does not melt, or the texture remains.
I think that it is fun with a slightly different texture like a film like the lens of this time.
If it feels like a bust-up while cutting your face a little, as the pins fit over the whole face, the body feels a little blur F4 ~ F5 is the best.
In a sitting posture, when the arm is entangled with the face, the body tends to be deep, so the line of the arm and the line to the eyes and the outline of the face, etc. come and go within the frame and it is easy to balance I will do.
In a sitting posture, when the arm is entangled with the face, the body tends to be deep, so the line of the arm and the line to the eyes and the outline of the face, etc. come and go within the frame and it is easy to balance I will do….
Although a little shadow got out strongly, I like the strength of the hair falling from the line of oblique face, the line of hands, the left arm, and the back fence.
It might have been fun if more light was added to the hair.
Opened a little, changed to shooting with conscious margin.
Here is Jupiter 9 ‘s interestingness.
Since the sun was behind closed completely, when the white balance was cloudy, saturation of Russian white appeared at once.
With a no filter this feeling is uniquely unique.
I think that it is a good taste of halation seen in Russian lenses. I personally call it Russian White.
Since the sun has returned, I returned the white balance, and considering that I got a bit closer, I thought that the aperture was around F3.
It is a very nice feeling condition that I am in the lower body.
I was able to do a good picture with a rally of hairmake’s idea.
This series blurred the hair and wanted to take the face and dry flower as if it came out in front, so I tried to chalky chopsticks, but it was about F5.
The sense of distance, the perspective and the ratio did not fit easily and I took quite a few sheets, but it is an impression that there were many things that I could take better than I thought.
The camera’s monitor (5 Dmark III this time) was a shot I thought would be a challenge if I had to think about the reference level.
If the sense of distance between the face and the body approaches to this extent, it may be better to narrow down more.
It seems to be good even about F8.
It is Jupiter-9 because the line is narrow, but I feel that it is not easy for me to squeeze it somewhat because it is a softer image.
In a good sense.
The contrast is a 5D Canon color image.
It seems that it will come out shallow a little if it is α7 Raw.
In addition, this neighborhood was taken by natural light at the window, and is it soft overall as a whole?
I guess this is the best frame.
It seems that the light streaks appearing on the face with the light from the left turned just right balance with the squeezing condition and the highlights of the arms and the shadow of the face went exquisitely well.
color, flare, ghost
Will the light go around inside the lens at once when the opening is near?
It changes obviously when it narrowed down slightly.
However, not only it but also a delicate line but a proper depiction will remain, so even if the color balance collapses somewhat due to the influence of light, it will be exactly what it is.
reflection, analysis of a little missing picture
I also wanted to try something near the quasi-wide angle, so I tried to get close by Zeiss’s inscription ball Flektogon 35mm
I think that the distortion of the face that I care about when approaching by the wide angle could be removed well, but it feels noisy with a bit of overshoot a bit.
I think that the distortion of the face that I care about when approaching by the wide angle could be removed well, but it feels noisy with a bit of overshoot a bit….
It may be that the background is slightly blurred at this level.
It was almost a test shot, but it may be that I wanted to do this a bit more.
Purchase route, repair and versatility, reference at the time of purchase
As for the story at the time of purchase, it is detailed in the previous article of Jupiter-9, so please refer if you are interested.
Even so, though I think it is a nice lens, I feel that it is not another popular one. At least this blog’s access count does not go up to tenth place.
Helios 44 of the same Russian lens is a dirt. . .
Camera : Canon 5D mark3
The development software is Photoshop CCC 2017 raw, adjusting the overall “exposure”, and those using dry flowers are well prepared for white balance.
The aperture was about F2.0 to F8, the shutter speed was 1/100 and it was almost fixed.
ISO uses the nuance of the aperture as priority and finally adjust it for adjustment.
As for white balance, many of the lenses were made to shoot in the shade due to the influence of ghost, so many of them were taken in the shade preset.
Lens Mount[us_mountSelect something ="M42_EF"]
In this blog, I decided to write a portrait also.
Although the position of the light is an old lens which is considerably affected by the texture in the reflection, it is the way of enjoying the old that the habit can be added to the photograph as a taste. I will write in that direction.
About the story at the time of shooting and the talk at the time of purchase Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 M42, a subject could float above bokeh softly.” As I have written even here, please do if it is interesting.
More from my site